On Travelogues

The cover of E Alexander Powell's 1922 travelogue 'Where the Strange Trails Go Down'

The cover of E Alexander Powell's 1922 travelogue 'Where the Strange Trails Go Down'

It seems as inevitable that voyaging should make men free in their minds as that settlement within a narrow horizon should make men timid and servile.

HG Wells, 1922

The first men were wanderers and their lives, if brutish and short, were a journey too, marked by constant movement and discovery. Unsettled and unencumbered, early man explored the globe. He left Africa 70,000 years ago. Thirty thousand years later, he reached Australia, and by the time a new man – the farmer – was sowing the Fertile Crescent’s first crops, the wanderer was navigating the Amazon River in a dugout canoe.

Agriculture brought settlement, cities and, six or seven thousand years ago, writing. Although man first wrote to keep account books, by 2600 BCE he was starting to inscribe his people’s tales in clay and stone, giving a stable, solid structure to narratives told loosely by earlier men. Writing made final what had been fluid before, which suited man’s new stability and the growing scale of his society, and like everybody who has sought a place in the world since, the first writers were primarily concerned with explaining their origins.

The oldest story long enough to enter literature’s canon is The Epic of Gilgamesh, a legend written in cuneiform that was lost until 1853, when it was found amongst the ruins of Nineveh, in what is now Iraq. The epic has a cast of hideous, spiteful monsters, petty gods, whimpering mortals and, in its protagonist, a tyrant – Gilgamesh, the King of Uruk, who is only two-thirds divine and as a result must die. The tale legitimises the rule of a heroic, godly despot over sedentary men, but the wanderer is not far gone, and the world’s first work of literature is mostly a travelogue, describing a journey to the known world’s end in search of eternal life.

Uruk’s citizens are treated badly by Gilgamesh at the start of the epic. He takes newlywed women to his bed by sovereign right and works the city’s men to the bone. Fed up, the people pray to the Mesopotamian gods and are heard: the gods distract the king by creating a companion for him – Enkidu, a primitive man covered in hair who “lives in the wild with the animals”. A man who is, in short, a wanderer. Enkidu is soon seduced by civilisation, quite literally: an accomplished temple prostitute is sent to him and after seven days of love making the two return to Uruk, where Enkidu becomes a shepherd. At his shepherds camp, Enkidu learns that Gilgamesh takes brides to his bed and, because he is still a man of pure, unfettered freedom – a symbol, in many ways, of the unbound people before civilisation – the practice enrages him. He goes to confront Gilgamesh and the two come to blows at the entrance to a wedding chamber. It is a fierce, close fought contest, but Enkidu is eventually bettered by the demigod. The tussle establishes mutual respect and the men become friends; later, after Gilgamesh’s mother adopts Enkidu, they become brothers. Together they travel to the Cedar Forest to kill its guardian, a hideous ogre who wears seven suits of armour, and together, by giving each other courage at critical moments, they succeed. As he lies dying, the ogre curses Enkidu. “Of you two,” he says, “may Enkidu not live the longer. May Enkidu not find any peace in this world!”

Enkidu is a creature of the gods, and for his temerity the gods take his life. He falls ill. Days later, he dies. Gilgamesh is left broken hearted and alone, but his short relationship with the wanderer has both ennobled the king and instilled in him an obsessive fear of death, and the rest of the epic is a description of Gilgamesh travelling, at first aimlessly through the wild clad in animal skins, while he mourns Enkidu, and later in search of Utnapishtim, the Mesopotamian equivalent of Noah, who was granted immortality for ensuring that life on land survived the deluge that is perhaps mankind’s most entrenched myth. Although Gilgamesh eventually finds Utnapishtim, he learns that his immortality was a once-off. Gilgamesh will die – but in the subtitle of the epic that is his story, He Who Saw the Deep, he lives on, and the Sumerians credited Gilgamesh with bringing back from his journey knowledge of how to worship the gods and how to be a just king, as well as an explanation for the mortality of men and the essence of living a good life.

John William Waterhouse's 1891 depiction of Odysseus and the sirens

John William Waterhouse's 1891 depiction of Odysseus and the sirens

Almost 1,500 years later, in about 800 BCE, the blind poet Homer penned a story not unlike The Epic of Gilgamesh called The Odyssey, a story that, together with The Iliad, established the Western literary tradition. The Odyssey follows the Greek hero Odysseus on his difficult journey home after the fall of Troy. It takes the king of Ithaca ten years to return to his island, where he is presumed dead, and the trials and temptations he encounters – like siren song and lotus eaters – have lived on in our language. When Odysseus eventually makes it home, he arrives alone; none of the men who left Troy with him have survived.

Early travelogues are mixed up with religion, and Odysseus’ story is no different. He is repeatedly obstructed by the sea god Poseidon and the last of his men perish after slaughtering the cattle of Hyperion, the sun god. Not all the gods persecute Odysseus: he is assisted by Athena, the daughter of Zeus, who appears at intervals throughout the narrative, but ultimately The Odyssey is not a religious story. Odysseus is considered the “peer of Zeus in counsel” and his cunning is unrivalled. Homer repeatedly invokes the epithets “resourceful” and “wise” to describe him and, in the end, Odysseus survives in spite of the gods, among foreign people in hostile lands, because of his individual gifts.

Writing about later travelogues, Paul Theroux hones in on individuality, and in it he identifies much of what makes the travel narrative valuable. “The writers of this time,” he says, referring to the supposed high water mark of travel writing in the 1930s, “sought to prove their own singularity by placing themselves in stark relief against a landscape that was primitive, or dangerous, or laughable, but in any case emphatically foreign.” Theroux might have cast his gaze back much further, because the rootless wanderer has always been a singular creature. It is not only that he is an outsider, a person with alien habits wearing alien clothes; what is more important – and more interesting – is that without the comfort of a neatly defined social role, or the safety of a civilisational context into which he can slot, the wanderer must define himself without comparisons to other people, except to say that they are tied to this place and I am not.

The travel writer emerges from this analysis a paradox, torn between his journey and his role as a journalist. He is both a wanderer, unbound, and a man with an audience, borrowing from the literary traditions of his culture. It is a divide he must straddle alone, and the travelogue is, in this sense, a link between settlement, with its child, writing, and the earlier world of nomadism.

Both The Epic of Gilgamesh and Homer’s Odyssey are myths, written generations after the protagonists died – if Gilgamesh and Odysseus ever lived. Greek and Roman travellers surveyed the known world, but stayed within cultural boundaries, like the geographer Pausanias, or only moved past it as part of an army, like Xenophon and Julius Caesar. Pilgrimage motivated people to travel alone to faraway places – spirituality is, after all, an individual pursuit – but for the fervent pilgrim, moving among his religious brothers, the destination is never an entirely foreign place. The Chinese Buddhists Faxian and Xuanzang travelled to India in the fifth and seventh centuries; neither wrote a description of his journey, but by relay, through other monks, a record of their experiences was preserved. Xuanzang spent five years at Nalanda, in modern Bihar. He was enraptured by the monastic city and its university, which contained a vast library – so vast that when it was razed by an Afghan army, centuries later, “smoke from the burning manuscripts hung for days like a dark pall over the low hills.” Xuanzang mastered Sanskrit at Nalanda; he bettered five hundred Brahmins, Jains, and heterodox Buddhists in debate and was offered a senior position on the university’s staff. Instead of accepting the offer, Xuanzang chose to return to China with a horde of sacred texts and relics. He translated the former, leaving behind the only copies to survive the destruction of Nalanda, and in time Xuanzang’s translations became the foundation of an idea that would itself travel: Zen Buddhism.

The two greatest travelogues of the Middle Ages were at first either dismissed as fiction or ignored. The story Marco Polo told Rustichello of Pisa in 1298, when the men shared a prison cell, was derided as the blather of a self-aggrandising con-artist because of both the outrageous success of Polo’s journey and the poverty of Western curiosity when it appeared. Polo travelled overland from the Mediterranean’s eastern shore to Khanbaliq, the Great Khan’s capital then and, by a different name, the capital of modern China today. He spent almost twenty years in the service of Kublai Khan, travelling across his empire as an emissary, and only returned to Venice when the Khan was old and near death, because he feared reprisal in the political turmoil that was sure to follow. Polo journeyed wider and deeper than modern men – with all the advantages of convenience and predictability – almost ever dare, and if Kublai Kahn had been a younger man, Polo might never have returned, and might never have told his story. True wanderers rarely do.

Although he travelled further than Marco Polo, covering a distance that nobody would surpass until the invention of the steamship, Ibn Batutta’s travelogue was largely ignored until the nineteenth century, when it was translated by European Orientalists. Batutta set out from Morocco on the hajj in 1325. He arrived at Mecca a year and a half later and, with his religious duty done, decided to join a caravan of hajjis returning to Iraq. Travel would become the whole purpose of Batutta’s life. He branched off from the caravan to Persia, followed trade winds to the coast of East Africa, joined the nomadic court of the Golden Horde, met the Byzantine emperor at Constantinople, benefited from the patronage of Delhi’s fickle sultan, reached China, where he travelled up the Grand Canal, and eventually returned to Morocco in 1349, 24 years later. Even then, Batutta continued moving, reaching Granada in 1351 and Timbuktu in 1353. He was more like a modern tourist than Polo, who was from a family of merchants and was, at least in part, a fortune seeker. Batutta carried his conservatism with him, castigating Turkish women for speaking plainly to men and the women of the Maldives for their revealing dress. He was employed for short periods, as a judge and an advisor on Sharia Law, but normally chose his destinations on a whim. If he could join a caravan or heard tales of wealth and wonder, Batutta packed and went, travelling for travel’s sake. He spent a single night in places it took him weeks to reach, and in the full title of the book he was instructed to dictate to a scribe by the Sultan of Tangiers, Batutta gave a hint of his nomadic soul: A Gift to Those Who Contemplate the Wonders of Cities and the Marvels of Travelling.

A map of Marco Polo and Ibn Batutta's routes through the Old World

A map of Marco Polo and Ibn Batutta's routes through the Old World. Click on the image for a larger version.

In the fifteenth century, a wave of explorers set out from Europe to discover new worlds, like Christopher Columbus, or to open new routes to trade, like Bartolomeu Dias. These explorers were also colonists, packing a full set of prejudices in with their sextants and patchy charts. In his journal, Columbus recorded his first, fateful landing in the New World, at an island in the Bahamas. The island’s people, who had gathered on the shore, were an afterthought: he only seemed to notice them after carrying the royal standard ashore, and claiming the territory for “the King and Queen his sovereigns.” Even then, the people – “well made, with fine shapes and faces” – were little more than potential converts to Christianity. “As I saw that they were very friendly to us,” wrote Columbus, “and perceived that they could be much more easily converted to our holy faith by gentle means than by force, I presented them with some red caps, and strings of beads to wear upon the neck, and many other trifles of small value, wherewith they were much delighted, and became wonderfully attached to us.”

Arrival, for Columbus, was empty of its normal joys. Like the other explorers of his age, he was completely filled by the idea of his own civilisation; there was no space left for the habits and beliefs of others. The travelogue is not normally a tale of conquest, and with a single exception – Fernão Mendes Pinto’s simply told Peregrinations – the Age of Exploration (and Expropriation) produced little travel writing of lasting value. But the world had started to shrink, and in some of the places that explorers had planted their flags, it was easier for writers to wander.

Only, the writer did not really exist yet. Men wrote and books were transcribed – normally at exorbitant cost, on the pelts of hundreds and sometimes thousands of calves – but the market for words was small. It depended on the same institutions that had stunted Columbus’ curiosity, the church and the king, with their loyal scribes – institutions rooted in the sedentary world. Gutenberg’s printing press, invented 37 years before Columbus arrived in the Bahamas, ate away at the institutional monopoly on words, but a class of men called writers did not properly emerge until the first copyright laws were passed in the eighteenth century, by governments scrambling to control the explosion of opinion and dissent that printing had enabled.

The professional writer was and still is a person with a single bond: his readers. If readers were interested in descriptions of a place, the writer could give in to his nomadism and go, and travelogues were among the first bestsellers. In 1727, Daniel Defoe, whose Robinson Crusoe is considered the first novel written in English, completed the third volume of his travelogue A tour thro’ the whole island of Great Britain. Samuel Johnson’s A Journey to the Western Islands of Scotland was published in 1775, twenty years after his definitive English dictionary. Goethe’s description of his Italian Journey, published in 1817, includes his still quoted awe at Michelangelo’s frescoes in the Sistine Chapel. “Without having seen the Sistine Chapel,” he wrote, “one can form no appreciable idea of what one man is capable of achieving”. Dickens also wrote about Italy, putting together a series of picturesque essays that were first published in 1846. Mark Twain paid a debt of $100,000 by embarking on a lecture tour across the British Empire in 1895, which he described in Following the Equator, and in 1899, Rudyard Kipling griped about everywhere that wasn’t India in From Sea to Sea. Lord Byron, Gustave Flaubert, Robert Louis Stevenson, Henry James, Herman Melville: all wrote travelogues as well as the defining fiction and poetry of the nineteenth century, and all were a part of the new class of professionals called writers.

A journey fits neatly into the format of a book: it has the prologue of departure and the epilogue of return, as well as the new beginnings of the next chapter and another place. Printing transformed books. It made them cheaper, putting descriptions of a wider world in the hands of middle-class Europeans, along with heretical beliefs and revolutionary ideas. It killed Latin, but made it possible to print the dictionaries that formalised other, modern languages. It created the novel, replacing the inane heroism of romantic literature with slowly unfolding inner worlds, inhabited by people who were realistically sketched. It changed travelogues too. Like novels, they turned inward and made less space for the fantastic. In 1486, Bernhard von Breydenbach could claim to have spotted a unicorn in the hills outside Jerusalem and expect to be believed, but by 1879, when Robert Louis Stevenson’s Travels with Donkey in the Cévennes was first published, unfamiliar landscapes and people were most interesting because of the effect they had on individual emotions. “For my part,” wrote Stevens, “I travel not to go anywhere, but to go. I travel for travel’s sake. The great affair is to move; to feel the needs and hitches of our life more nearly; to come down off this feather-bed of civilisation, and find the globe granite underfoot and strewn with cutting flints.”

People no longer wrote ‘Here be dragons’ on maps, and travellers could no longer return claiming to have found them. Confined to what was real, or at least realistic, travel writers started to produce useful history. When I compiled Tales of Old Singapore, I sifted through thousands of sources. I looked at old postcards, government notices, newspaper reports and the ledgers that tallied Singapore’s trade, but the most compelling descriptions, the descriptions that breathed life into a vanished world, were almost always written by people passing through. Singapore might have been an exception – it was, in the words of Charles Hendley, “a clearing house for travellers” – but if the past is in fact a foreign country, it makes sense that travel writers, translating their experiences for a readership at home, would make the best guides.

The printing press was not the only invention that changed the travelogue. Travel itself had changed: by the middle of the nineteenth century, steamships were chugging between continents and rail networks were spidering out across Europe and North America. The word tour, which entered the English language in the fourteenth century, was being used as a verb by 1746, to describe the Grand Tour that young British aristocrats made through continental Europe. By 1772, people were talking about tourists and, by 1811, tourism. Thomas Cook founded his company in 1841. In 1869, he escorted paying guests on a cruise along the Nile and in 1874, he started issuing traveller’s cheques. The modern travel industry had been born, and with every passing year people travelled longer distances in greater numbers with growing ease.

Travelogues were not just written by explorers and travelling authors anymore. Anybody with the means to take a long holiday could record the experience and hope, not too optimistically, that it would be published. The number and variety of travelogues that describe Singapore after 1869, when the Suez Canal opened, is a large part of what makes these outsiders’ perspectives useful to historians, but in Charles Hendley’s use of the term clearing house, and in the countless descriptions of the Raffles and Europa hotels, where everybody stayed if they could afford to, there is a hint of the monotonous industrialisation of travel that plagues wanderers today.

Another of the nineteenth century’s new technologies transformed both how we travel and the travelogue: photography. The first photograph was taken in 1826. By 1849, men were lugging camera equipment out of Europe, to document the world’s most beguiling sights. Maxime Du Camp was among them. He travelled through Syria, Palestine, Egypt and Nubia with Flaubert, taking photographs as a substitute for sketches. “I had realised on my previous travels,” he said, “that I wasted much valuable time trying to draw buildings and scenery I did not care to forget…I felt I needed an instrument of precision to record my impressions.” The first cameras were unwieldy, hugely impractical contraptions, and wandering with them was initially impossible. “Learning photography is an easy matter,” said Du Camp. “Transporting the equipment by mule, camel or human porters is a serious problem.” In India, Samuel Bourne, another of travel photography’s pioneers, employed as many as fifty porters to carry his bulky camera along with the chemicals and plates he needed to operate it.

The cart Roger Fenton used to carry photographic equipment during the Crimean War

The cart Roger Fenton used to carry photographic equipment during the Crimean War

There was a picture of Bernhard von Breydenbach’s unicorn in his book, Peregrinatio in Terram Sanctam, along with panoramic views and scenes from everyday life. The illustrations – drawn by an artist in von Breydenbach’s party and printed using woodblocks – were an innovation, but almost all later travelogues included some level of graphic detail, most of it in sketches or paintings produced by the author while on the road. Photography might be seen as an organic, inobtrusive continuation of drawing, but even if its initial clumsiness is ignored, photography transformed both the traveller and the travelogue – more subtly, perhaps, than the steamship, but no less pervasively.

Wandering does not fit neatly into a frame. It is neither entirely external, like a photograph, nor completely ephemeral. In his journey, the wanderer possesses a strand that connects yesterday with today and one place with another, but photography captures without context. It is a momentary medium that can only represent fragments of any dimension, including time. Samuel Bourne recognised at least one of these limitations in the Himalaya, while on an expedition to photograph the source of the Ganges. “With scenery like this,” he wrote, “it is very difficult to deal with the camera: it is altogether too gigantic and stupendous to be brought within the limits imposed on photography.” Bourne also recognised how photography could train and improve the eye. “It teaches the mind to see the beauty and power of such scenes as these,” he wrote. “For my own part, I may say that before I commenced photography I did not see half the beauties in nature that I do now, and the glory and power of a precious landscape has often passed before me and left but a feeble impression on my untutored mind; but it will never be so again.”

The act of framing and exposing a photograph can, as Bourne put it, “teach the mind to see beauty,” but it more often teaches the mind to see other photographs. A photographer must break the world into fragments and moments that fit within a frame. He must think of light and movement mechanically, in terms of aperture widths and shutter speeds. If he does this often – and to be good he must – photography will completely reshape the way he processes the visual world. For pioneers like Bourne, who sometimes needed hours to complete a single exposure, this was less of a problem than it is today, when photographs are instantaneous and close to free. Bourne had porters and pack animals, but in most other ways, his method of travelling and his eye were not substantially different to an artist’s. Today, photography is more like a visual monomania, and it afflicts travellers far more than it does other groups. You see its symptoms in tourists taking a photograph of nearby people without making eye contact or saying hello, because they see what is picturesque before they see what is human. You see it in people who drown out the chirping of birds in the morning with the whir of closing shutters and, in severe cases, you see it in tourists forcing an entire journey through the viewfinder of their camcorders, replacing an experience with a manufactured memory.

A photograph of Cairo's skyline from Maxime Du Camp's Egypte, Nubie, Palestine, Syrie

A photograph of Cairo's skyline from Maxime Du Camp's 'Egypte, Nubie, Palestine, Syrie'

Travelogues progressed along a more or less linear path in the twentieth century. Although aeroplanes brought a new kind of fragmentation and the size of the travel industry ballooned, great writers continued travelling and, in magazines, a new, glossy format for descriptions and photographs from a journey was found. The twenty first century has been far more disruptive. The first blogs led quickly to the first travel blogs, instead of the first online travelogues. It was a new medium and perhaps it made sense to use a new name, but instead of marking an upward progression, the phrase travel blog is associated with a feeble form of one of the world’s oldest narrative traditions.

This prejudice is, in the majority of cases, completely justified. Too many travel blogs are facile when they are not fatuous. Blogs that function like letters to friends and family should, perhaps, be excused – even if some of the most readable travelogues of the past two centuries started life as a series of letters – but there are now well over a thousand travel blogs that actively seek an audience, and most of them are depressingly poor. They describe interactions with the travel industry instead of the larger world and are, as a result, like reading badly edited, first person Lonely Planet guides. They are self-reductive, confining their narratives to keywords popular on Google, like solo, solo female, family travel, eco-travel and round the world, which is aptly abbreviated to RTW, because most of these whistle stop gallivants are themselves extremely abbreviated. They are light on history, politics and context in general, but heavy on technically proficient but clichéd photography and vacuous best-of lists. The worst are self-congratulatory and patronising, written with enough gall to inform readers that they too can travel, usually along the same dismal beaten track as the blogger. Most of all – and most of the time – travel blogs are badly written. To capture an audience that browses instead of reading, blog posts must be short, easy to consume and frequent. As a result, there are both good and bad writers with insipid and tedious travel blogs.

There are notable exceptions – like Gary Hause, who is walking around the world, and Becky Sampson, who is riding a horse across Eurasia – but even they are distinguished less by the quality of their prose than by their ambitious journeys. There are also travel bloggers who stand out because they possess acute local knowledge, like Evan Villarrubia and Andy Keller, Mandarin speakers who spent a year cycling across China, and a handful of travel bloggers who work hard to balance writing well with chasing sponsorship and traffic, like Barbara Weibel and Theodora Sutcliffe.

It is unfair to hold individual bloggers entirely responsible for the degeneration of the travelogue. The travel industry, which likes reductive writing and best-of lists, started dictating the content of magazines and the travel pages of newspapers long before blogs existed. It is easily absorbing this new, less centralised medium now. Journeys might have fitted neatly into the format of a book, but do not fit nearly as well into the hyperlinked, asynchronous structure of the internet. The result is writing that is as fragmented as photographs, without links and transitions between countries and cultures. “Travel,” wrote Paul Theroux, “is transition,” and without it little of the wanderer or what made the travelogue literary remains.

The Odyssey is still widely read, almost 3,000 years after it was first composed, and Marco Polo is perhaps the most famous man of not just his generation, but an entire era. Brave journeys and great travel stories live on, perhaps forever, but the average blog post is written for the readers it might find on Facebook, Twitter and StumbleUpon today. To be enduring, a travelogue needs context; it needs to speak to what has come before, but most of all it needs to add to our understanding of a place and its people today. Too many travel bloggers think that they are achieving the latter by putting a hackneyed description in front of a new set of eyeballs, but the historians of the future, surveying travel blogs as they exist now, are unlikely to find much they can use.

The first men were wanderers and, because it is now possible to work remotely, in contact with people everywhere, it is easier than ever for man to wander again. The new nomads do not resemble Enkidu, who “lived in the wild with the animals.” They are too plugged in and too shaped by the settled world, but it would be nice if they, like him, were occasionally outraged and unfettered enough to fight tyrants. George Orwell and Ernest Hemingway did, with words as well as guns, and both wrote travelogues that will endure. It would be nice, too, if they made more of the connection between the journey and the journal. A blog is, after all, just a journal, and where and how you travel are just as important as what you write.

If you enjoyed On Travelogues, subscribe to email updates or our RSS Feed. You’ll be notified when we next publish a story about the Old World.

15 Responses to “On Travelogues”

  1. My dearest Iain:

    I have just finished reading this wonderfully thoughtful and well-researched article and I simply must share some thoughts.

    First, I cannot thank you enough for including me in your short list of "notable exception" blogs. That, coming from such an accomplished writer, is high praise indeed. Of course, you know that I share your sentiments. Much of the writing on the Internet is of poor quality; there are precious few good reads and it is getting even worse as time goes by. As you indicated, in order to earn enough money to stay on the road I have to balance my writing with chasing sponsorships and advertising. In a perfect world, I would deal only with my writing, photography and video (in that order), but alas, the reality is that I must earn an income to live. Selling ads is the concession I have made to meet this need. However, I have not followed the current trend of accepting guest and sponsored posts for a fee. In my opinion, these are thinly veiled PR advertorials that could never live up to my standard; they would be a jarring departure from my intensely personal narrative tone and genre and I refuse to subject my readers to them, even though doing so would mean a lot more income. Every word on my site is written by me (although I am trying to convince both of my sisters, who are also fine writers, to join me), about places I have visited or am intending to visit, therefore my readers can be confident that my stories are honest.

    Which brings me to point #2. I dislike the term "travel blogger" and have never used it to describe myself. I am a travel writer or a journalist who specializes in travel and culture, as are you. Mainstream media have used this term to disparage us as a group (perhaps that is well-deserved in toto), and will continue to do so until we begin to think of ourselves as something more than bloggers.

    And of course, that leads me to my final thought. In my opinion you are not, nor have you ever been, a blogger. When I read this article I was transported. Your grasp of the history of travelogues and the amount of research that must have been required to write it took my breath away. I love your blog, but this could easily have appeared in National Geographic. I know you won't say it, so I will. You are one of the finest travel writers out there and your travelogue should be in the top ten for anyone who is passionate about travel.

    Fondly,

    Barbara

    • Iain Manley says:

      Barbara,

      I think your kind comment might have gone straight to my head! Thank you so much.

      You said:

      Much of the writing on the Internet is of poor quality; there are precious few good reads and it is getting even worse as time goes by.

      I agree, but I'm not sure it's getting worse as time goes by. You probably have a better handle on how much good narrative travel writing is produced for the internet, because of your efforts to highlight it, but I think that people's online attention spans are, in general, improving. Digital versions of books, magazines and newspapers have started to outsell hard copies and good writing will ultimately be what people want. More and more websites – like Long Reads, The Browser.com and Byliner – bring attention and traffic to well-constructed narratives that are time-consuming to write and read. All of them are doing quite well, so there must be a market, and perhaps they will slowly evolve into the sorts of structures travel writers of the future will need.

  2. Katrina says:

    "…most of them are depressingly poor." I disagree. There are many so-called "blogs" about travel that are more focused on SEO and advertisements than content, but bloggers I've read who focus on the sincerity of their experience, and sharing same, offer a great deal of insight and connection. Perhaps it is simply that I was fortunate enough to step into the rarefied air of good travel blogger groups early on, but I greatly appreciate the genuine craftsmanship that goes into the blogs I follow.

    Perhaps more importantly, I appreciate the personalities that emerge. Blogging is related to literary endeavors and forms of the past, even based in them, but is not bound by the same constraints. I see it, therefore, as a changing and emerging art form.

    While you acknowledge that the travel industry is a fan of reductive writing, my impression is that, like those of the "Age of Exploration," you may likewise be completely filled by the idea of your own "civilisation [and have little] …space left for the habits and beliefs of others."

    It's not that I don't understand, and even agree in some cases (I frequently lament the declining use of the Oxford comma, something that I was taught was an absolute, rather than optional), but change is what makes a language live. Old English and Middle English are quite different from contemporary English, for example. For the sake of purity, I imagine I could learn to write in Latin, as it has been declared a dead language, but I enjoy being a reflection of and participant in my time.

    Perhaps a dash of compassion for those who are simply doing the best they can with the tools they have is warranted. Beyond that, I suggest differentiating between travel blogs that genuinely seek to communicate or entertain readers, and those that attempt to game the SEO system: "personality writers" vs. "SEO-bot writers." Or "those that give you something" vs. "those that seek only your wallet."

    I hope adding these things to your criteria will result in a more favorable view of the contemporary form of the venerable travelogue.

    Cordially,

    Katrina

    • Iain Manley says:

      Katrina,

      Thank you for your comment. I was expecting much angrier, much less balanced responses than yours. I'm almost disappointed!

      I agree that blogging is a changing and emerging art form and that my idea of good literature might be somewhat old-fashioned. I often think my writing is.

      I can't agree with your assertion that "personality bloggers" compare well with travelogues of the past. There are exceptions, of course, and I pointed out two of them, but they are drowned out by crowds who are not "SEO-bot writers" but are equally indistinguishable from each other. Mark Twain was a lot like a "personality blogger", but his style was chattily idiosyncratic and his commentary was original and incisive.

      Here is an excerpt from Following the Equator, about Cecil John Rhodes:

      Before the middle of July we reached Cape Town, and the end of our African journeyings. And well satisfied; for, towering above us was Table Mountain—a reminder that we had now seen each and all of the great features of South Africa except Mr. Cecil Rhodes. I realize that that is a large exception. I know quite well that whether Mr. Rhodes is the lofty and worshipful patriot and statesman that multitudes believe him to be, or Satan come again, as the rest of the world account him, he is still the most imposing figure in the British empire outside of England. When he stands on the Cape of Good Hope, his shadow falls to the Zambesi. He is the only colonial in the British dominions whose goings and comings are chronicled and discussed under all the globe's meridians, and whose speeches, unclipped, are cabled from the ends of the earth; and he is the only unroyal outsider whose arrival in London can compete for attention with an eclipse.

      That he is an extraordinary man, and not an accident of fortune, not even his dearest South African enemies were willing to deny, so far as I heard them testify. The whole South African world seemed to stand in a kind of shuddering awe of him, friend and enemy alike. It was as if he were deputy-God on the one side, deputy-Satan on the other, proprietor of the people, able to make them or ruin them by his breath, worshiped by many, hated by many, but blasphemed by none among the judicious, and even by the indiscreet in guarded whispers only.

      What is the secret of his formidable supremacy? One says it is his prodigious wealth—a wealth whose drippings in salaries and in other ways support multitudes and make them his interested and loyal vassals; another says it is his personal magnetism and his persuasive tongue, and that these hypnotize and make happy slaves of all that drift within the circle of their influence; another says it is his majestic ideas, his vast schemes for the territorial aggrandizement of England, his patriotic and unselfish ambition to spread her beneficent protection and her just rule over the pagan wastes of Africa and make luminous the African darkness with the glory of her name; and another says he wants the earth and wants it for his own, and that the belief that he will get it and let his friends in on the ground floor is the secret that rivets so many eyes upon him and keeps him in the zenith where the view is unobstructed.

      One may take his choice. They are all the same price. One fact is sure: he keeps his prominence and a vast following, no matter what he does. He "deceives" the Duke of Fife—it is the Duke's word—but that does not destroy the Duke's loyalty to him. He tricks the Reformers into immense trouble with his Raid, but the most of them believe he meant well. He weeps over the harshly-taxed Johannesburgers and makes them his friends; at the same time he taxes his Charter-settlers 50 per cent., and so wins their affection and their confidence that they are squelched with despair at every rumor that the Charter is to be annulled. He raids and robs and slays and enslaves the Matabele and gets worlds of Charter-Christian applause for it. He has beguiled England into buying Charter waste paper for Bank of England notes, ton for ton, and the ravished still burn incense to him as the Eventual God of Plenty. He has done everything he could think of to pull himself down to the ground; he has done more than enough to pull sixteen common-run great men down; yet there he stands, to this day, upon his dizzy summit under the dome of the sky, an apparent permanency, the marvel of the time, the mystery of the age, an Archangel with wings to half the world, Satan with a tail to the other half.

      I admire him, I frankly confess it; and when his time comes I shall buy a piece of the rope for a keepsake.

      It is travel writing, but it is also one of the best biographies of Rhodes I have ever read. If you can point to a single post by a "personality blogger" that is written half-as-well and matches Twain's engagement with the politics of a place, instead of just its travel industry, I'll retract what I've written.

      Good writing has nothing to do with Oxford commas. (I find it strange that you miss them but use blogese like btw on your site.) It is, for me, about adding something to the body of literature that is probably our greatest inheritance. Twain might be singular, but that only makes it more important for personality bloggers today to be singular. He also sets a high bar. I have no problem with that: I set high bars for my writing as well as the writing of others. There is no place for compassion – directed at the author – in good literary criticism.

  3. Sasha says:

    I'm blown away by this post Iain! It's so well researched I really enjoyed the history lesson, I've definitely got a whole bunch of new things to add to my reading list. I like how you used history to compare and contrast the modern day travelogue/blog to travelogues of the past.

    I've been trying to pinpoint exactly what it is that has me jaded with travel blogging, at first I thought it was just all the chatter, all the focus on being successful, making money etc. Then I realised it's more then that, I'm not just jaded with travel blogging myself I don't even want to read other travel blogs because over 2 years of reading I've realised most of what I'm reading is the same. People focus on rewriting the facts, "This is how I got here…This building is 300 years old…" etc and like you said in the future the historians aren't going to get anything out of it. What I miss reading and what I want to get back to writing is stories, stories of the people I encounter, the experiences, the sights, the sounds, the smells, something that I can look back on in the future and say 'wow that's changed' or 'remember when…'

    Maybe that's partly why I'm not writing so much travel stuff, now days I'm only writing if I have a story to tell and experience to share that's not in the guidebook. After all Lonely Planets done a good enough job doing what they set out to do, why regurgitate the same information under a different banner and a different domain name!

  4. Kumar says:

    Awesome article. I often times get travelogues from google ebooks (the public domain ones are free) and read them at night on my iPad or phone. 

    These journeys do indeed transport us; and, at the same time make our present more clear.  As of late I've been reading blogs by American travelers on the "great loop". This is a journey done on the American great lakes and mississippi rivers and the inter coastal waterway. It takes them over a yeAr to finish the journey!!  

    It is good reading from these modern day explorers–many of the blogs do suffer from a lack of contextual history– but as I read through many of them, I have come to realize that the first journey men/women can't provide too much context; as, the're simply trying to get to a given destination. I think the second generation of travelers on the same journey are the ones that should be held responsible for a more "advanced" narrative. 

    This is a link to those blogs   http://www.greatloop.org/mod/aglcawebsite/index.p

  5. Peter Whitehouse says:

    I am sure you are famialiar with it but Robert Byron's "The Road to Oxiana" should definetly join the Travelogue list

  6. Cynthia Young says:

    Great article, thank you! I am currently working on my M.A. Thesis on travel writing. I am focusing on the works of Freya Stark, most of which are now in the public domain. I enjoy her writing because it manages to capture the culture, politics and people of the time. She considered herself to be an explorer rather than a tourist. Perhaps this is a distinction that should be made with contemporary travelogues.

    • Iain Manley says:

      Thanks Cynthia. I've heard of Freya Stark – in an article, I think, on Paul Theroux's Tao of Travel – but I've never read any of her writing. I looked her up and found this quote:

      One can only really travel if one lets oneself go and takes what every place brings without trying to turn it into a healthy private pattern of one's own and I suppose that is the difference between travel and tourism.

      It makes more or less the same distinction as you do, if you substitute travel (or traveller) for explorer, which is useful I think, because there are plenty of good travelogues written by people who weren't explorers. I think it is extremely difficult for travel bloggers to take "what every place brings without trying to turn it into a healthy private pattern of one's own." There is too much pressure to produce now, not when you get home, which means finding an internet connection, somewhere to work and – depending on how much you have to do – a routine. Journalists have been doing this for years, and the BBC's show From Our Own Correspondent is essentially a series of news-related travelogues, produced by people with tight deadlines – but they're plugged into a large organisation, which simplifies things considerably.

      I've found Freya Stark on Archive.org. Do you yo have a favourite book, or even a favourite passage, that I can use here?

  7. Cynthia Young says:

    “To awaken quite alone in a strange town is one of the pleasantest sensations in the world. You are surrounded by adventure. You have no idea of what is in store for you, but you will, if you are wise and know the art of travel, let yourself go on the stream of the unknown and accept whatever comes in the spirit in which the gods may offer it. For this reason your customary thoughts, all except the rarest of your friends, even most of your luggage – everything, in fact, which belongs to your everyday life, is merely a hindrance. The tourist travels in his own atmosphere like a snail in his shell and stands, as it were, on his own perambulating doorstep to look at the continents of the world. But if you discard all this, and sally forth with a leisurely and blank mind, there is no knowing what may not happen to you.”

    ? Freya Stark, Baghdad Sketches

  8. Iain Manley says:

    Wonderful! Unfortunately I can't find a public domain copy of Baghdad Sketches.

    Do you have any favourite passages from Dust In The Lion's Paw, Ionia: A Quest, The Valleys Of The Assassins, Letters From Syria or The Southern Gates Of Arabia, which I have found? Or do you know where I can find Baghdad Sketches?

  9. Thanks for the tip for the Mark Twain – I'm reading that now in preparation for a return to India after 30 years. I've enjoyed the first part of your journey in Kindle format. Agree about travel bloggers of course, but it's difficult, as I'm sure you've discovered, to write as you go along and still make it reflective.

  10. Sorry I"m late to the party, but since I'm the publisher of A Traveler's Library, of course I was fascinated by this post on classic travel literature. I cover all genres of writing as long as they inspire or inform travel, and frequently write about classic travel writers. Freya Stark is certainly a must–and you can see my reviews of a couple of her books at A Traveler's Library.

    I hope you're familiar with Norman Lewis and Patrick Leigh Fermor, as well, although I don't think you'll find them for free. And an unexpected travel writer is American president Theodore Roosevelt.

    Since you love India, you might like Lady Duff Gordon's Letters from Egypt.

    Thanks for an interesting list of important travel writing.

Leave a Reply

Comment Policy

We welcome encouragement, questions and advice. Perhaps welcome isn't strong enough. Comments are the best and more or less only reward we receive for putting Old World Wandering together. We're addicted to the words at the end of an article because they, A, tell us you got that far and, hopefully, B, enjoyed getting there. But please stick to the topic and use your real name or a nickname. Generic comments submitted for SEO purposes will be deleted.

Top